Art
and Photography > What Others Say About Adi Da's
Art > Rajesh Shukla The
Ancient Walk-About Way of Adi Da Samrajby Rajesh
Shukla
Rajesh
Shukla is an art critic and the author of several books, including Contemporizing
Buddha, Hindu
Tantra Yoga, and Concerning
The Spiritual In Art: An Indian Modern Art Perspective. He received his
B.A in Fine Art and Philosophy from Allahabad University in 1993. He took Sanyasa
for two years, and studied the six systems of Indian philosophy, focusing specially
on Vedanta from the Sankaracharya of Puri, Swami Nischalananda Saraswati. He was
the winner of the Lalit Kala Academy Scholarship Award for art criticism in 2005.
He is currently working on a book, Buddhist Tantra Yoga. He lives and
works in Delhi, India.
This
article first appeared on TheEnlightenedWorld.org,
an online art and culture magazine of India created by Rajesh Shukla in 2007.
Adi Da Samraj is a distinctive spiritual teacher, philosopher, and artist.
His divine teachings are a light to humanity. He is not an orthodox teacher who
leads people through sheer superstition; rather he is one who awakens. He is a
contemporary Buddha; in him the Divine manifests in its uttermost glory. In his
individuality, one finds manifestation of spiritual, philosophical, literary,
and artistic genius. When he asserts that he is the One, that divine guru who
awakens, then he speaks the ultimate, the truth of Vedanta. His writings throw
light on his wisdom and the truth he inaugurates. In the very beginning of the
essay, “I Am The One Who Would Awaken You”, Adi Da proclaims the truth that is
also known in Vedanta:
The world itself
is not Truth — nor is life, nor psyche and body, nor death, nor experience. No
event is, in and of itself, Truth. Everything that arises is an appearance to
Consciousness Itself, a modification of the Divine Conscious Light That Is Always
Already the Case.
Avatar Adi Da Samraj, from “I Am The One
Who Would Awaken You” in The
Ancient Walk-About Way
|
In the Brihadaranyaka
Upanishad, the sage, Yagyavalkya, communicates the same truth to Maitreyee:
Vacha rambhano vikaro namdheyam — of which the intended meaning is:
"All this manifestation of form and name is of truth only". Adi Da identifies
truth with consciousness that is always awake and is said to be the seer of everything,
every happening, whether it is happening outwardly or inwardly. "There is
One Who is Wide Awake while He Appears in the dream", he says. Recall once
again the Brihdaranyaka Upanishad Yagyavalkya, King Janaka’s discourse
on truth:
(In the dream state), after enjoying
himself and roaming, and merely seeing (the result of) good and evil (in the dream),
he stays in the state of profound sleep, and comes back in the inverse order to
his former condition, the dream state. He is untouched by whatever he sees in
that state, for this infinite being is unattached.
|
This consciousness that is absolute, wide awake and already the case is He.
This is what is called realization in the sense of absolute ‘I’. Uddalaka taught
this to Svetaketo: ‘thou art that’ means that absolute consciousness which is
wide awake, albeit awareness ‘itself’ is ‘thou’. In his teachings, Adi Da
employs two methods. First, with his sharp philosophical truth, he removes superstitions,
beliefs, and false ideas. Second, he convinces one to embrace reality itself,
leaving behind childish notions of God that are based on the principle of dependence.
He writes:
Traditional Spirituality,
in the forms in which it is most commonly proposed or presumed, is a characteristically
adolescent creation that represents an attempted balance between the extremes.
It is not a life of mere (or simple) absorption in the mysterious enclosure of
existence. It is a life of strategic absorption. It raises the relatively non-strategic
and unconscious life of childhood dependence to the level of a fully strategic
conscious life of achieved dependence (or absorption). Its goal is not merely
psychological re-union, but total psychic release into some (imagined or felt)
‘Home’ of being. Avatar Adi Da Samraj from “Moving Beyond
Childish and Adolescent Approaches to Life and Truth” in Religion
and Reality
|
Adi Da does not
propose being in an “imaginary” home, or a historical one sought by many western
philosophers. His concept of ‘ousia’, the house of being, is not any imaginary
category, but rather is the already existent, unborn, given truth. This is the
very truth in which we are living, in which we are being born and to which we
can be restored. Adi Da writes:
Real
(Acausal) God — or the Transcendental, Inherently Spiritual, Inherently egoless,
and Self-Evidently Divine Reality (Prior to conditional self, conditional world,
and the ego-bound conventions of religion and non-religions) — Is the One and
Only Truth of Reality Itself, and the One and Only Way of Right Life and Perfect
Realization. Avatar Adi Da Samraj from “God as the ‘Creator’,
God as ‘Good’, and God As the Real” in Religion
and Reality
|
The way to realize
this truth is the way of Adi Da, since in him the absolute is manifesting in its
uttermost glory. He teaches how to transcend the views or ideas that are by and
large formed and based on beliefs. One’s belief in and about God is based on imaginary
notions. Therefore, the first step towards truth realization is getting rid of
all the hitherto notions of God-Ideas. Adi Da says that, “true religion requires
the utter transcending of all views”. He is very clear in his approach to religion
and it is very much akin to Vedanta. His sole philosophy of the spiritual is in
the likeness of Vedanta, but by proclaiming himself an Avatar who has come on
this earth to liberate beings, he offers another way of self-realization. Adi Da shatters false intellectualization and philosophies. By teaching
devotion to the Realizer he reveals that love is the highest and most far reaching
Divine principle. It is this Divine principle that humanity is forgetting. Regarding
this, Buddha said that the fragrance of faith goes beyond all since it carries
with it not earthly but Divine intelligence. Adi Da Samraj’s world is full of
mystery. He is not only a spiritual teacher but a distinguished artist too. I
have never known (or even read about) any other artist who unites philosophy and
art. His works of art are not simply visuals but are, rather, truth statements
— because of this truth, the visuals appear. In Adi Da's art, spiritualization
takes place because philosophy and art "converse". This is contrary
to Picasso, who did not believe in philosophy. As far as modern art is concerned,
only Kandinsky believed in the philosophy of art. He criticized Picasso, saying,
“He shrinks from no innovation, and if color seems likely to balk him in his search
for a pure artistic form, he threw it overboard and paints a picture in brown
and white; and the problem of purely artistic form is the problem of his life.”
Because Picasso did not believe in the spiritual, he worked from reason. Therefore,
one rarely finds visual purity in his work. In contrast, Adi Da is very close
to Kandinsky. He too believes in the Kandinskian theory of purity of color:
As
both a distinguished artist and philosopher, Adi Da asserts in his book, Transcendental
Realism, that to create spiritual art, one must transcend “all perceptual
and conceptual means themselves, through the Tacit Self-Recognition of the Intrinsically
Self-Evident ‘Non-chaos’ (or the Always Prior Self-Unity, Indivisibility, Indestructibility,
and Inherent Egolessness) of Reality Itself.” Adi Da is the one and only
artist whose art is beyond idiom. In idiom, the artist often encloses himself
by repetition; he neither finds the truth content of art nor the language of art
itself. In idiom, the artist dies. Regarding idiom, Derrida, the great philosopher
and grammatologist of art, says:
Those who have
faith in idiom supposedly say only one thing, properly speaking, and say it in
linking form and meaning too strictly to lend itself to translation, thus mystifying
an art work on the basis of falsely created "form-meaning" dialectics.
An artist who has enclosed himself in idiom and style falsifies the truth of art
by saying, "See the form I have created and search for the meaning in it"
that he himself does not know.
|
Derrida summarizes
by saying that, “Form fascinates when one no longer has the force to understand
force from within itself. To understand force from within itself is to create.”
This rejects the idiom- and style-centric trends of art that are, by and large,
prevalent the world over. Adi Da is postmodern
in this sense, because he knows the very locus from where things appear. Images
are things, and they appear on the surface, carrying multiple messages of the
locus. In this sense, Adi Da does not express, rather he creates. The way He creates
his art is very intricate because of the demand from the truth content of the
image; it searches its own body, its own form to appear. Perhaps this is why,
for each and every ‘truth content’, Adi Da has a different language. When creating,
he must be very sensitive to the creative process, because the image he is making
will change the participant's ‘point of view’. Hence his images appear
‘as it is’ — an expression of Reality Itself. |